Prime Gamer
Stuff about games, by gamers

Main menu:


-

Site search

Categories

September 2009
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Links

Tags

primegamer

Bought our game? Buy it again, please.

» Written by Devin

So the new trend for a lot of big titles seems to be to re-release the game about a few months to a year after the game’s original release. A few examples of this include Star Wars: The Force Unleashed – Ultimate Sith Edition and LittleBigPlanet: Game of the Year Edition. Both of these games are re-releases of games that came out last year, but they add content that was not found in the original game. Most of this content is stuff that can be found as DLC on the Xbox Live Marketplace or PlayStation Store, but now the companies behind these games have decided to add some new content to the game, content that’s not available anywhere else.

Don’t get me wrong, I understand where they’re coming from when it comes to these types of re-releases. They want to add even more content to an already attractive package to entice even more people into buying the game. I have no problem with that as long as they just stick to stuff such as already released DLC or new DLC that’s also available for owners of the normal version, but what point is there in adding exclusive content to these games? From what I’ve seen it does nothing but anger people who have already bought the game, as they obviously want the content but can’t justify buying a game they already own at nearly full price once again.

In addition to angering fans, it’s also a missed monetary opportunity. As long as it’s reasonably priced, I’m sure most people would not have a problem purchasing the additional content as DLC. Another $5-$15 investment goes over much easier than a $40-$60 one, and at the same time it still makes the re-release an attractive package for new buyers as it would still be cheaper to get it over buying the old game (even at a discounted price) and all the DLC separately. Thus, they’d obviously have more sales from old fans buying DLC then they would of old fans buying the re-release. But of course, this makes logical sense, so of course a lot of companies wouldn’t actually do it.

Then again, this could all just be a marketing ploy. While the developers/publishers may have come out and stated that this content would be exclusive to the re-release version, there’s nothing stopping them from actually releasing the content as DLC later on down the road. But by making people believe the content is truly exclusive, it may help raise initial sales of the re-release as some truly diehard fans may still be willing to buy a game they already own at nearly full price. Thus, they still get the benefit of better sales in the beginning but can satisfy fans and make even more money in the long run by going this route.

Of course, without any solid examples to back any of this up, all of these theories are nothing but my opinion. It will certainly be interesting to see how these two titles, and any future titles that employ this method, turn out in the end. So what do you think? Am I just channeling my inner fanboy rage, or is this a disturbing new trend that needs to be stopped now?

Comments

Comment from Paco @ September 13, 2009 at 5:51 pm

I have a love/hate relationship with this kind of tactic. I mean, if the game is good, it should warrant the price of the purchase and if you don’t have the game yet, it’s probably a good idea to opt for the latter release since it has more incentive. But, for example, those of us who actually coughed up cash for Left 4 Dead only to find a “Game of the Year” release on the shelf a couple of months later felt like we got shunned. It makes it worse when you find out that Left 4 Dead 2 is coming out at the end of that SAME FISCAL YEAR.

So yeah. It would be nice if they made the game properly the first time.

Comment from Ben @ September 13, 2009 at 8:12 pm

To be honest the Left 4 Dead GotY edition was actually a massive rip off as it only included the Survival Pack DLC, which was free. OK so you lost out on the 100Mb of space it required, but I’d take an 100Mb download over the £15 extra the GotY edition would have been to pick up versus the price I paid.

I have no real issue with this tactic of bundling DLC into games and re-releasing them with a bit of a price bump. Sure you can get pissed that you’ve effectively paid more for the game and its DLC, but that happens every time you buy a game anywhere near release, so just deal with it. What I don’t like is this idea of additional content that’s exclusive to a re-release as that is clearly aimed at making people buy the game again, which is retarded.

Write a comment